What is the difference between
<section>
and <div>
in HTML? Aren't we defining sections in both cases?Legal Provisions of Section 188 of Indian Penal Code, 1860. Disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant: Disobedience to an order duly promulgated by a public servant has been made an offence under this section. The section states that when an accused knows that a public servant has lawfully promulgated an order, which he.
PeeHaa51.1k4343 gold badges171171 silver badges245245 bronze badges
SimplicitySimplicity16.4k7171 gold badges194194 silver badges318318 bronze badges
12 Answers
<section>
means that the content inside is grouped (i.e. relates to a single theme), and should appear as an entry in an outline of the page.<div>
, on the other hand, does not convey any meaning, aside from any found in its class
, lang
and title
attributes.So no: using a
<div>
does not define a section in HTML.From the spec:
<section>
The
<section>
element represents a generic section of a document or application. A section, in this context, is a thematic grouping of content. Each section
should be identified, typically by including a heading (h1-h6 element) as a child of the <section>
element.Examples of sections would be chapters, the various tabbed pages in a tabbed dialog box, or the numbered sections of a thesis. A Web site’s home page could be split into sections for an introduction, news items, and contact information.
...
The
<section>
element is not a generic container element. When an element is needed only for styling purposes or as a convenience for scripting, authors are encouraged to use the <div>
element instead. A general rule is that the <section>
element is appropriate only if the element’s contents would be listed explicitly in the document’s outline.(https://www.w3.org/TR/html/sections.html#the-section-element)
<div>
The
<div>
element has no special meaning at all. It represents its children. It can be used with the class
, lang
, and title
attributes to mark up semantics common to a group of consecutive elements.Note: Authors are strongly encouraged to view the
<div>
element as an element of last resort, for when no other element is suitable. Use of more appropriate elements instead of the <div>
element leads to better accessibility for readers and easier maintainability for authors.(https://www.w3.org/TR/html/grouping-content.html#the-div-element)
Paul D. WaitePaul D. Waite66.1k4848 gold badges173173 silver badges255255 bronze badges
<section>
marks up a section, <div>
marks up a generic block with no associated semantics.672k7777 gold badges915915 silver badges10741074 bronze badges
<div> Vs <Section>
Round 1
<div>:
The HTML element (or HTML Document Division Element) is the generic container for flow content, which does not inherently represent anything. It can be used to group elements for styling purposes (using the class or id attributes), or because they share attribute values, such as lang. It should be used only when no other semantic element (such as <article>
or <nav>
) is appropriate.<section>:
The HTML Section element (<section>
) represents a generic section of a document, i.e., a thematic grouping of content, typically with a heading.Round 2
<div>:
Browser Support<section>:
Browser SupportThe numbers in the table specifies the first browser version that fully supports the element.
In that vein, a div is relevant only from a pure CSS or DOM perspective, whereas a section is relevant also for semantics and, in a near future, for indexing by search engines.
Subodh GhulaxeSubodh Ghulaxe14.3k1212 gold badges7272 silver badges9494 bronze badges
Just an observation - haven't found any documentation corroborating this
If a section contains another section, a h1-header in the inner section is displayed in a smaller font than a h1- header in outer section.When using div instead of section the inner div h1-header is diplayed as h1.
-- the Level2 - header is displayed in a smaller font than the Level1 - header.
When using css to color h1 header, the inner h1 were also colored (behaves as regular h1).It's the same behaviour in Firefox 18, IE 10 and Chrome 28.
runecrunec
In the HTML5 standard, the
<section>
element is defined as a block of related elements.The
computerfreaker<div>
element is defined as a block of children elements.6,00166 gold badges2525 silver badges4747 bronze badges
srikanth_ksrikanth_k1,64122 gold badges99 silver badges1414 bronze badges
Take caution not to overuse the section tag as a replacement for a div element. A section tag should define a significant region within the context of the body. Semantically, HTML5 encourages us to define our document as follows:
This strategy allows web robots and automated screen readers to better understand the flow of your content. This markup clearly defines where your major page content is contained. Of course, headers and footers are often common across hundreds if not thousands of pages within a website. The section tag should be limited to explain where the unique content is contained. Within the section tag, we should then continue to markup and control the content with HTML tags which are lower in the hierarchy, like h1, div, span, etc.
In most simple pages, there should only be a single section tag, not multiple ones. Please also consider also that there are other interesting HTML5 tags which are similar to section. Consider using article, summary, aside and others within your document flow. As you can see, these tags further enhance our ability to define the major regions of the HTML document.
KoolWebDezignKoolWebDezign
<div>
—the generic flow container we all know and love. It’s a block-level element with no additional semantic meaning (W3C:Markup, WhatWG)<section>
—a generic document or application section. A normally has a heading (title) and maybe a footer too. It’s a chunk of related content, like a subsection of a long article, a major part of the page (eg the news section on the homepage), or a page in a webapp’s tabbed interface. (W3C:Markup, WhatWG)My suggestion: div: used lower version( i think 4.01 to still) html element(lot of designers handled that).section: recently comming (html5) html element.
Paul D. Waite66.1k4848 gold badges173173 silver badges255255 bronze badges
anglimasSanglimasS95722 gold badges1414 silver badges4040 bronze badges
The section tag provides a more semantic syntax for html. div is a generic tag for a section.When you use section tag for appropriate content, it can be used for search engine optimization also. section tag also makes it easy for html parsing. for more info, refer. http://blog.whatwg.org/is-not-just-a-semantic
pooamlairajpooamlairaj3,38033 gold badges1414 silver badges2424 bronze badges
Using
<section>
may be neater, help screen readers and SEO while <div>
is smaller in bytes and quicker to typeOverall very little difference.
Also, would not recommend putting
droohdrooh<section>
in a <section>
, instead place a <div>
inside a <section>
39311 gold badge1010 silver badges2828 bronze badges
The
<section>
tag defines sections in a document, such as chapters, headers, footers, or any other sections of the document.whereas:
The
<div>
tag defines a division or a section in an HTML document.The
steveax<div>
tag is used to group block-elements to format them with CSS.15k55 gold badges3535 silver badges5757 bronze badges
JeevesJeeves11011 gold badge22 silver badges1717 bronze badges
<section></section>
The HTML
<section>
element represents a generic section of a document, i.e., a thematic grouping of content, typically with a heading. Each <section>
should be identified, typically by including a heading (<h1>
-<h6>
element) as a child of the <section>
element. For Details Please following link.References :
<div></div>
The HTML
<div>
element (or HTML Document Division Element) is the generic container for flow content, which does not inherently represent anything. It can be used to group elements for styling purposes (using the class or id attributes), or because they share attribute values, such as lang. It should be used only when no other semantic element (such as <article>
or <nav>
) is appropriate.References: - http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_div.asp- https://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Web/HTML/Element/div
Here are some links that discuss more about the differences between them:
Ashwin Krishnamurthy3,26011 gold badge1818 silver badges4747 bronze badges
Asad AliAsad Ali
Here is a tip on how I distinguish couple of recent html5 elements in the case of a web application (purely subjective).
<section>
marks a widget in a graphical user interface, whereas <div>
is the container of the components of a widget like a container holding a button, and a label etc.<article>
groups widgets that share a purpose.<header>
is title and menubar.<footer>
is the statusbar.Kaan E.Kaan E.
protected by QuentinSep 12 '18 at 12:10
Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged html5html or ask your own question.
< Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads | California | History (Redirected from Wikipedia:WikiProject California State Highways/History/List of relevant laws)
For laws designating state highways up through 1925, see legislative act roads.
- 1927
- c. 166 p. 315: CHC can make preliminary surveys to determine whether a proposed state highway should be added
- c. 794 p. 1562: classified into primary/secondary
- 1929
- c. 537 p. 946: amended 1915 Big Oak Flat and Yosemite Road law, allowing for a realignment
- c. 541 p. 948: amended 1913 Bakersfield, Maricopa and Ventura State Highway law; shall not become a state highway until the counties complete it
- SCR 19 c. 25 p. 2096: additions should be studied
- 1931
- c. 82 p. 102: established 23 new secondary state highways
- c. 96 p. 127: established 23 new secondary state highways
- SCR 10 c. 58 p. 3112: additions should be studied
- 1933
- c. 9 p. 17: Bay Bridge will be built as a state highway
- c. 106 p. 562: fixed duplication of 1931 c. 82 and c. 96 but made no substantive changes
- c. 317 p. 895: amended 1921 Rio Vista-Lodi law, allowing relocation
- c. 393 p. 1019: CHC is authorized to buy Sears Point Toll Road
- c. 428 p. 1078: gives Sacramento River bridge in Meridian to the state
- c. 767 p. 2029: adds a whole bunch of secondary highways
- c. 963 p. 2487: DPW should complete causeway across Tisdale By-pass in Sutter County
- SCR 7 c. 34 p. 2952: CHC should submit a list of highways to add (that became c. 767)
- 1935
- c. 29 p. 248: combined existing laws into the S&HC; includes 1935 amendments
- c. 274 p. 959: amended primary highways; kept old alignment of Route 4 via Saugus; amended Routes 7, 23, 48, 64, 74, 163, 165
- c. 426 p. 1480: repealed Route 186 and added Route 205
- c. 427 p. 1480: amended Route 107
- c. 429 p. 1480: amended Route 193 and added routes 203 and 204
- c. 513 p. 1585: added a secondary state highway from Needles east to Arizona (Route 58)
- c. 626 p. 1764: amended Route 62 and added a part to Route 77
- c. 630 p. 1766: added Route 206
- c. 634 p. 1773: CHC is authorized to buy Muir Wood Toll Road
- c. 828 p. 2246: deals with Golden Gate Bridge approaches
- AJR 62 c. 114 p. 2683: asks for federal funds for Route 163
- 1937
- c. 15 p. 78: added Route 207 (s. 612)
- c. 36 p. 109: amended Route 122
- c. 48 p. 118: added Bay Bridge to Route 68
- c. 50 p. 119: amended Route 163
- c. 194 p. 491: amended old alignment of Route 4 via Saugus
- c. 219 p. 515: amended Route 74
- c. 841 p. 2358: amended primary highways and Routes 8, 40, 44, 51, 61, 68, 69, 74, 77, 104, 125, and added Routes 203-206, repealing the additions of those from 1935
- 1938
- AJR 2 c. 11 p. 155: relating to Funston approach
- 1939
- c. 338 p. 1676: if Route 210 is built by the US government, it becomes a state highway
- first page is missing from scan; here's the text: CHAPTER 338. An act to add section 653 to the Streets and Highways Code, relating to State highways. [Approved by Governor June 2, 1939. Filed with Secretary of State June 2, 1939.] The people of the State of California do enact as follows: SECTION 1. Section 653 is hereby added to the Streets and Highways Code, to read as follows:
- c. 473 p. 1819: amended primary list and Routes 4, 6, 16, 38, 65, 79, 104, 207 added Route 208 (s. 613)
- c. 687 p. 2203: freeway defined
- c. 794 p. 2325: added Route 209 (s. 613.2)
- ACR 5 c. 76 p. 3213: CHC should study extending Route 205 to Route 9
- ACR 21 c. 86 p. 3225: relating to Funston approach
- 1940 1st ex. sess.
- AJR 8 c. 10 p. 208: requests federal assistance with a road over Mammoth Pass
- ACR 8 c. 24 p. 225: CHC should study Clovis to Friant
- 1941
- c. 142 p. 1185: amended Routes 45, 166, 207
- c. 226 p. 1296: relating to Funston approach
- AJR 47 c. 96 p. 3487: requests federal assistance for Sign Route 20
- SCR 43 c. 104 p. 3510: DPW should investigate taking over the Mount Tamalpais Ridgecrest Boulevard
- 1941-42 1st ex. sess.
- ACR 24 c. 50 p. 88: temporary four-lane highways
- 1943
- c. 661 p. 2413: Route 56 can be relocated in San Mateo County
- c. 964 p. 2849: amended Routes 18, 173, 209, added Route 210 (s. 614), repealed former Route 210 law
- 1945
- c. 1214 p. 2302: amended Route 2
- c. 1269 p. 2386: amended Route 62, deleted Route 169
- 1946 2nd ex. sess.
- AJR 5 c. 17 p. 465: Routes 77 and 192 through Prado Dam land
- 1947 1st ex. sess.
- c. 11 p. 3788: Collier-Burns Highway Act of 1947; amended Routes 158, 161, 167, added Routes 221-229
- c. 13 p. 3812: amended Route 74, added Routes 212, 230 (s. 543)
- c. 19 p. 3824: relocation of Route 5 in Santa Clara County
- 1947
- c. 436 p. 1338: relating to traversable highways
- c. 772 p. 1850: removes distinction between primary and secondary
- c. 1233 p. 2736: amended Routes 11, 52, 68, 69, 165, 172, 196
- c. 1370 p. 2921: added Route 213 (s. 530)
- c. 1449 p. 3020: added San Leandro to Oakland via the Posey Tube to Route 252 as a primary state highway (s. 252) - but the primary/secondary split no longer existed! and Route 252?!
- 1949
- c. 17 p. 31: amended 1947 1st ex. sess. c. 19
- c. 909 p. 1677: amended Routes 3, 46, 144, 160, added Route 213, deleted old Route 213 law
- c. 1044 p. 1941: CTBA to acquire San Mateo-Hayward and Dumbarton Bridges; amended Routes 105, 107
- c. 1261 p. 2215: added Route 231
- c. 1422 p. 2484: amended Route 226, deleted section 252 (relating to Route 252, added 1947)
- c. 1467 p. 2555: amended Routes 3, 46, 62, 75, 144, 160, 167, added Routes 207, 213, 214 (s. 508), deleted old Route 213 law
- SCR 25 c. 122 p. 3139: DPW to study Altamont Pass to Grapevine
- ACR 53 c. 154 p. 3293: DPW to study MacArthur to Susanville
- ACR 102 c. 189 p. 3405: DPW to study south of Bakersfield to Selma
- 1950
- ACR 10 c. 18 p. 401: DPW should study a north bay crossing
- SCR 6 c. 19 p. 401: DPW should study expressway between LA and SF
- ACR 10 c. 26 p. 594: DPW should study Doyle to Sierra Ordnance Depot
- ACR 23 c. 30 p. 600: DPW should study Ogilby-Palo Verde Road to Colorado River
- 1951
- c. 1562 p. 3559: amended Routes 53, 64, 75, 135, 154, 158, 159, 167, 171, 196, renumbered Route 207 as Route 232 (s. 507), deleted Routes 181, 183
- c. 1588 p. 3585: amended Route 56
- SCR 16 c. 72 p. 4374: US 101 north of SF should be improved
- SJR 24 c. 126 p. 4556: Sign Route 88 should be a defense artery
- 1953
- c. 237 p. 1375: amended Route 77
- c. 1253 p. 2812: amended Route 160
- c. 1408 p. 3002: amended Route 15
- c. 1485 p. 3096: deleted Route 214
- c. 1617 p. 3319: amended Route 135
- c. 1700 p. 3434: added Route 234 (s. 546)
- c. 1737 p. 3486: amended Routes 74, 75; extended Route 75 across the Benicia-Martinez ferry
- c. 1786 p. 3569: amended Route 40
- c. 1787 p. 3569: amended Routes 14, 105, added Route 233 (s. 553)
- c. 1791 p. 3572: added Route 233 (s. 547)
- c. 1793 p. 3574: amended Route 202
- c. 1836 p. 3626: amended Routes 12, 119, 178, 209, 221
- ACR 18 c. 100 p. 3972: DPW should relocate Route 56 in Marin County
- SCR 67 c. 194 p. 4234: DPW should expedite Porterville bypass on Route 65
- AJR 8 c. 204 p. 4253: Joint Highway District No. 26 acquires land for Mountain Boulevard (later Route 227)
- 1954
- c. 8 p. 254: amended Route 75 (they unintentionally deleted part from the definition in 1953 - oops!)
- 1955
- c. 76 p. 517: amended Route 212
- c. 1488 p. 2700: amended Routes 15, 56, 158, 212, 232, 233
- c. 1789 p. 3297: added Route 236 (c. 556)
- c. 1912 p. 3523: amended Route 138
- AJR 5 c. 38 p. 3880: still trying to get the Mammoth Pass Road built
- SJR 21 c. 196 p. 4196: US 6, US 50, US 395, and Sign Route 12 should be submitted to the Interstate Highway System
- ACR 113 c. 226 p. 4224: DPW should study a connection between the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge and Route 14
- ACR 80 c. 235 p. 4235: Route 23 should be widened between Palmdale and Lancaster
- 1956
- c. 63 p. 454: added Route 237 (s. 557)
- SCR 5 c. 27 p. 488: DPW to study Woodland to Grapevine
- SCR 6 c. 57 p. 528: DPW to study US 50 Alternate via Sign Routes 88 and 49
- SCR 7 c. 58 p. 529: DPW to study Roseville to Bakersfield
- 1957
- c. 23 p. 578: added Route 239 (s. 559)
- c. 24 p. 578: added Route 240 (s. 560)
- c. 26 p. 581: added Route 238 (s. 558)
- c. 36 p. 592: amended Routes 6, 7, 14, 15, 17, 21, 24, 56, 59, 69, 71, 87, 106, 110, 137, 170, 173, 174, 175, 178, 179 to follow planned freeways
- c. 52 p. 616: deleted Route 233 and added Route 235 (s. 553)
- c. 1911 p. 3342: amended Routes 2, 9, 19, 20, 31, 37, 45, 60, 61, 75, 79, 98, 154, 159, 161, 162, 164, 167, 172, 174, 182, 190, 205, 227, 235, deleted Route 234
- SCR 26 c. 80 p. 4397: DPW should study an overall freeway and expressway system
- SCR 107 c. 240 p. 4632: relating to Route 212
- ACR 159 c. 267 p. 4661: relocating part of Route 1
- ACR 174 c. 269 p. 4663: designates Route 1 as the Redwood Highway; seems to be confused north of Crescent City
- SCR 122 c. 295 p. 4751: US 399 should be widened to connect with Route 238
- SCR 131 c. 301 p. 4756: relating to the Devore Cutoff
- ACR 165 c. 304 p. 4763: Route 83 should be improved south of Lassen Park
- ACR 172 c. 307 p. 4766: Route 158 should be completed
- ACR 190 c. 309 p. 4768: relating to Route 57 and the Vaquero Reservoir
- SCR 83 c. 314 p. 4773: DPW to study Ventura to Taft or Maricopa (see also US 399)
Resolutions are not listed below here.
- 1958
- c. 74 p. 305: amended Route 167
- 1959
- c. 32 p. 1884: added Route 241
- c. 435 p. 2373: amended Route 46 to allow for a non-continuous route
- c. 1062 p. 3110: created F&E System, amended Routes 6, 20, 32, 51, 62, 65, 69, 74, 82, 88, 97, 107, 108, 109, 110, 115, 122, 135, 140, 146, 153, 156, 160, 167, 170, 176, 187, 192, 193, 194, 206, 210 (renumbered from s. 614 to s. 510), 221, 228, 229, 235 (renumbered from s. 553 to s. 535), added Routes 186, 214, 243-290
- c. 1355 p. 3627: amended Route 127
- c. 1382 p. 3663: added Route 242
- c. 1569 p. 3900: defined named roads including El Camino Real (simply Route 2)
- c. 1841 p. 4381: amended Routes 26, 47, 56, 76, 80, 103, 114, 143, 226, 253
- c. 1853 p. 4409: added Route 216
- c. 1860 p. 4418: added Route 169
- c. 2065 p. 4772: amended Route 115
- c. 2089 p. 4836: added Route 30
- c. 2144 p. 5112: amended Route 115
- 1961
- c. 1010 p. 2691: amended Route 253
- c. 1146 p. 2886: amended F&E System, amended Routes 5, 8, 15, 16, 23, 26, 43, 54, 66, 68, 76, 99, 114, 115, 116, 168, 212, 213, 226, 239 (renumbered from s. 559 to s. 539), 272, 282, 287
- c. 1154 p. 2899: amended Route 135
- c. 1247 p. 3007: added Route 183
- c. 1268 p. 3046: amended Route 121
- c. 1271 p. 3048: amended Route 105
- c. 1382 p. 3156: added Route 295
- c. 1387 p. 3159: amended Route 146
- c. 1768 p. 3782: added Route 218
- c. 1770 p. 3784: amended Route 184
- c. 1838 p. 3917: added Route 291
- c. 1840 p. 3917: amended Route 163
- c. 2013 p. 4226: added Route 292
- 1962
- SCR 8 c. 67 p. 134: DPW should study a renumbering
- 1963
- c. 385 p. 1171: entire renumbering; should continue to post U.S. Highways until the Interstates are complete
- c. 526 p. 1406: amended Route 286/109
- c. 890 p. 2133: added Route 254/296
- c. 901 p. 2144: added Route 254/296
- c. 1698 p. 3325: amended the F&E System, amended Routes 13, 17, 20/36, 34/88, 35, 36, 37, 41, 48/128, 65/49, 75/4, 108, 129, 141/204, 142/155, 230, 241, 281/75, 282, 292/78, /170, /178
- c. 1729 p. 3450: amended Route 291/213
- c. 1898 p. 3890: added Route 294/255
- c. 2155 p. 4498: amended Route 5/26, added Route 291/253
- 1964
- SJR 3 c. 73 p. 675: Redwood Highway (101/199) should be an Interstate
- 1965
- c. 65 p. 945: amended Route 87
- c. 551 p. 1878: relating to signs on business routes
- c. 1330 p. 3216: amended Routes 42 and 90
- c. 1371 p. 3262: amended Routes 2, 12, 18, 29, 46, 57, 61, 78, 106, 122, 125, 128, 137, 138, 141, 158, 168, 180, 217, 237, 238, 244, 280, 680, added Routes 259, 262
- c. 1372 p. 3269: amended F&E, Routes 7, 17, 22, 34, 42, 47, 49, 61, 63, 72, 73, 74, 79, 84, 90, 107, 108, 143, 155, 159, 170, 186, 214, 217, 248, 250, repealed Routes 51, 117, 163, 165, 177, 188, 194, 196, 211, 212, 215, 226, 241, 245, added Routes 256, 257, 258, 260, 261, 276
- c. 1397 p. 3317: added Route 261
- c. 1401 p. 3320: amended Route 96, added Route 263
- c. 1402 p. 3320: amended Route 97, added Route 265
- c. 1425 p. 3353: added Route 267
- c. 1769 p. 3956: added Route 268
- c. 1875 p. 4324: added Route 266
- c. 2007 p. 4537: amended Routes 14, 27
- c. 2068 p. 4812: added Route 274
- 1966
- SCR 17 c. 94 p. 872: relating to whether Route 275 should be relinquished
- 1967
- c. 674 p. 2043: amended F&E
- c. 1101 p. 2739: amended Route 605 (only added a name)
- c. 1223 p. 2989: amended Route 126 (only added a name)
- c. 1323 p. 3149: amended Route 203
- c. 1331 p. 3162: amended Route 254
- c. 1350 p. 3183: added Route 275
- c. 1483 p. 3476: amended Route 75, added Route 282
- c. 1584 p. 3792: amended F&E, Route 227, added Route 273
- 1968
- c. 281 p. 620: amended Route 78
- c. 282 p. 621: amended F&E, Routes 1, 4, 10, 15, 35, 36, 48, 49, 60, 71, 80, 82, 87, 90, 96, 101, 105, 135, 150, 156, 160, 170, 176, 217, 218, 254, 260, 263, 273, 280, 480, 605, repealed Routes 42, 110, 240, 243, added Route 241
- c. 431 p. 1037: US 60 should be signed on I-10 east of Beaumont
- c. 1139 p. 2156: amended Routes 75, 282
- c. 1319 p. 2493: amended Route 118
- 1969
- c. 294 p. 656: amended F&E, Routes 15, 60, 71, 74, 78, 79, 81, 91, 274, 395, repealed Route 103, added Routes 163, 380
- c. 726 p. 1458: amended F&E
- c. 1179 p. 2310: amended Route 87
- 1970
- c. 634 p. 1253: amended F&E
- c. 881 p. 1616: amended Route 255
- c. 1473 p. 2913: amended F&E, Routes 33, 62, 65, 87, 104, 145, 162, 165, 230, 247, 255, 380, added Routes 243, 270, 271, 281, 283, 284, 285, repealed Route 268
- 1971
- c. 66 p. 91: amended F&E
- c. 146 p. 197: amended F&E
- c. 179 p. 246: amended F&E
- c. 963 p. 1873: amended F&E
- c. 998 p. 1915: amended F&E
- c. 1247 p. 2445: amended F&E
- c. 1398 p. 2749: amended Route 170
- 1972
- c. 150 p. 193: amended F&E
- c. 524 p. 905: amended F&E
- c. 742 p. 1331: amended Route 115, added Route 186
- c. 748 p. 1339: added Route 269
- c. 782 p. 1397: amended F&E
- c. 812 p. 1457: amended F&E
- c. 1051 p. 1931: amended Route 276
- c. 1216 p. 2345: amended F&E, Routes 8, 30, 32, 33, 78, 98, 111, 122, 125, 142, 157, 162, 174, 193, 195, 201, 263, 275, 282, repealed Routes 69, 106, 109, 207, 231, 241, 261, added Routes 117, 177, 186, 188, 245, 330
- 1973
- c. 423 p. 892: amended F&E
- c. 447 p. 913: amended Route 77
- c. 602 p. 1125: amended Route 93
- c. 882 p. 1632: amended F&E
- 1974
- c. 123 p. 247: amended Route 3
- c. 537 p. 1236: amended F&E, Routes 15, 71, 79, repealed Route 31, added Routes 194, 371
- 1975
- c. 95 p. 169: amended F&E
- c. 244 p. 636: amended F&E, Routes 65, 244
- c. 506 p. 1033: amended F&E
- c. 1078 p. 2638: amended Route 141
- c. 1106 p. 2683: amended F&E
- c. 1107 p. 2684: amended F&E
- 1976
- c. 1354 p. 6170: amended F&E, Routes 11, 12, 33, 60, 74, 75, 78, 81, 84, 88, 111, 117, 122, 140, 141, 160, 206, 259, 263, 282, 680, repealed Route 21, added Route 780
- 1977
- c. 919 p. 2803: amended Route 91
- 1978
- c. 287 p. 578: amended F&E, Route 204
- c. 1043 p. 3230: amended Route 39
- 1979
- c. 572 p. 1798: added Route 207
- 1980
- c. 740 p. 2205: amended Route 1
- c. 777 p. 2303: amended Route 87
- 1981
- c. 292 p. 1409: amended F&E, Routes 9, 23, 24, 27, 39, 40, 47, 50, 62, 72, 79, 84, 99, 105, 111, 139, 160, 195, 222, 275, repealed Routes 11, 214, 250, 880, added Routes 51, 110, 980
- 1982
- c. 681 p. 2783: amended F&E, Routes 60, 74, 81, 91, 206, 259, repealed Route 194, added Route 215
- c. 914 p. 3351: amended Routes 7, 47
- 1983
- c. 849 p. 3116: amended Route 73
- 1984
- c. 409 p. 1761: amended F&E, Routes 1, 2, 5, 10, 16, 17, 18, 23, 25, 26, 30, 32, 35, 36, 37, 49, 61, 77, 84, 86, 89, 96, 97, 99, 103, 104, 108, 109, 114, 121, 138, 149, 160, 163, 172, 180, 185, 193, 207, 221, 244, 251, 260, 262, 266, 280, 580, 605, repealed Routes 7, 208, added Routes 211, 710, 880
- c. 1258 p. 4311: amended Routes 1, 135, 246, repealed Route 176
- 1985
- c. 46 p. 146: amended Routes 65, 148
- c. 385 p. 1561: amended Route 72
- 1986
- c. 928 p. 3213: amended Routes 18, 41, 43, 60, 66, 70, 74, 88, 89, 103, 125, 168, 248, 266, 980, repealed Route 117, added Route 905
- 1988
- c. 106 p. 436: amended F&E, Routes 36, 41, 44, 47, 72, 82, 84, 85, 87, 93, 99, 130, 187, 237, 980, repealed Route 141
- c. 416 p. 1782: amended Route 109
- c. 609 p. 2171: amended F&E
- c. 1363 p. 4559: added Route 241
- c. 1364 p. 4561: added Route 231
- 1990
- c. 1187 p. 4962: amended F&E, Routes 2, 4, 24, 35, 36, 114, 123, 128, 148, 152, 221, 222, 235, 236, 244, 254, 580, added Route 7
- 1991
- c. 498 p. 2439: amended F&E, Routes 1, 101, repealed Route 480
- c. 775 p. 3480: amended Route 231, added Route 261
- c. 928 p. 4163: repealed Route 206
- 1992
- c. 1243 c. 5856: amended F&E, Routes 1, 41, 46, 68, 72, 101, 105, 129, 135, 144, 175, 183, 224, 227, 254, repealed Routes 159, 248
- 1994
- c. 1220 p. 7507: amended Routes 4, 7, 15, 18, 26, 53, 60, 71, 91, 128, 175, 187, 215, 244, 247, 255, 275, added Route 11, repealed Routes 157, 171, 252, 256
- 1995
- c. 20: amended Route 111
- 1996
- c. 10: amended Routes 48, 138, 224
- c. 264: amended Route 39
- c. 540: amended Route 145
- c. 823: amended Route 2
- c. 1154: amended F&E, Routes 18, 111, 133, 241, 261, repealed Routes 224, 231, 275
- 1997
- c. 277: amended Route 109
- c. 945: amended Route 91
- 1998
- c. 221: repealed Route 30, amended F&E, Routes 57, 210
- c. 828: amended F&E, Route 299
- c. 877: amended F&E, Routes 2, 19, 36, 225, repealed Routes 228, 285
- 1999
- c. 99: amended Routes 54, 144
- c. 172: amended Routes 19 and 160
- c. 559: amended Route 101
- c. 724: amended F&E, Routes 18, 44, 66, 83, 142, 259, 330, repealed Route 274
- c. 1007: amended Routes 91, 217
- 2000
- c. 270: amended Route 110
- c. 523: amended Route 209
- c. 538: amended Route 880
- c. 596: amended Route 39
- c. 787: amended Route 227
- 2001
- c. 136: amended F&E
- c. 597: amended Route 19
- c. 757: amended Routes 1, 126
- c. 825: amended Routes 2, 25
- 2002
- c. 27: amended Route 90
- c. 248: amended Route 66
- c. 251: amended Route 66
- 2003
- c. 5: amended Route 84
- c. 62: amended Route 90
- c. 177: amended Route 19
- c. 594: amended Route 2
- c. 525: amended Routes 39, 54, 73, 90, 91, 101, 107, 110, 111, 126, 160, repealed Route 209
- 2004
- c. 325: amended Route 260
- c. 386: amended Route 79
- c. 396: amended Route 164
- c. 399: amended Route 39
- c. 650: amended Routes 2, 170, 227
- 2005
- c. 22: amended Route 227
- c. 594: amended Routes 74, 111
- 2006
- c. 315: amended Routes 58, 178, 204
- c. 318: amended Route 79
- c. 362: amended Route 193
- c. 507: amended Routes 66, 83
- 2007
- c. 218: amended Route 164
- c. 718: amended Routes 79, 111
- 2008
- c. 179: amended Route 164
- c. 635: amended Routes 49, 74
- c. 639: amended Routes 1, 107
- c. 669: amended Route 110
- c. 717: amended Routes 1, 34, 66, 232
- 2009
- c. 189: amended Routes 1, 108, 201
- c. 238: amended Routes 1, 55, 146
- c. 291: amended Routes 92, 185, 238
- 2010
- c. 448: amended Routes 82, 130
- c. 491: amended Routes 1, 2, 19, 39, 58, 71, 72, 74, 79, 83, 84, 111, 144, 151, 160, 164, 170, 260, 275
- c. 499: amended Routes 19, 66
- 2011
- c. 536: amended Routes 39, 225
- 2012
- c. 769: amended Routes 49, 66, 74, 92, 110, 111, 146, 152, 178, 185, 193, 227, 238
- 2013
- c. 523: amended Routes 1, 19, 25, 39, 49, 58, 66, 68, 74, 82, 86, 130, 710
- 2014
- c. 43: amended Route 131
- c. 335: amended Route 16
- c. 345: amended Routes 1, 34, 55, 232
- 2015
- c. 12: amended Route 275
- c. 451: amended F&E, Routes 92, 170, 185, 238
- c. 553: amended Route 74
- c. 561: amended Routes 1, 187
- c. 575: amended Route 164
- c. 630: amended Route 16
- 2016
- c. 398: amended Route 75
Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_U.S._Roads/California/History/List_of_relevant_laws&oldid=758839574'